Wheel Dilemma
The pain of the Jackson Park race is fading into a happy memory, and it’s time to start looking ahead to the next race. Gear-wise, I am going to be making some modifications which include making sure I have a spare set of wheels in the pit. The current wisdom around cross circles is that the most effective upgrade one can make to a cross bike is to move to using tubular wheels. I’m a sucker for fads, no doubt, but I decided to analyze this a bit before jumping for tubs. So here is a comparison of two sets of wheels I’d be likely to get — one tubular and one clincher.
The wheels: Neuvation makes nice wheels and cuts out the middleman which means the price is good without having to schmooze up a bike store owner to buy other wheels at cost. Their M28 SL’s (clincher) and C50’s (tub) are competitive in all major factors with wheels costing multiple times more, so I’ll very likely go with one of these. Yes, I know I could get lighter wheels in both categories, but I’m sticking to what I am actually likely to buy.
Weight:
C50’s with Griffo Challenge tires in 32mm: 2180 grams
M28 SL’s with same tires and tubes: 2495 grams
The difference is 315 grams or about .75lb. This isn’t much in the grand scheme of things, but it’s important to note that nearly all that weight is near the outside of the rim. Rotational weight is widely considered to be much more important than static weight. In general, it’s difficult to lop 3/4 of a pound off the weight of the bike in one fell swoop any other way.
Price:
C50’s with Griffo Challenge tires and glue: $759
M28 SL’s with the same tires and tubes: $378
The clinchers are nearly half the price. This doesn’t take into account the ongoing wheel costs, which are potentially much higher with tubs either. Flatting a tub means at least a can of Vittoria pit stop, and can mean a new tire. Rolling tub or replacing an unfixable flat also means glue costs.
Pressure:
This is the big consideration, and the one most open to idiosyncratic observation. I’m only interested in my own plight, and I can run my current clinchers very reliably at 40lbs in the back and 35 in the front. I have experimented with as low as 35/30 and I pinch flatted occasionally. As for tubs, I suspect I could run 30/25 without endangering the wheel on most courses. The tubs clearly win in the pressure category.
Other concerns:
There are other concerns that play in which are more difficult to quantify too. Carbon wheels are more fragile, no doubt, but the deep rims potentially offer some performance gain in the mud (i.e. mud doesn’t stick to them). Having suffered with road tubs, I know that running tubulars can be a time suck with the gluing etc. Clinchers offer the ability to switch tires easily to match course conditions, and you can only match this by having several sets of tubs with different tires (which is not going to happen).
Conclusion:
I actually wrote this up while gathering the facts. My guess from the start was that the cost of the tubs would seriously outweigh the benefits, but I am not sure at this point. The rotational weight difference is pretty significant by itself. The pressure difference isn’t enormous, but it too is not insignificant. In the background I also know that I have a set of Mavic GP4 wheels that could be rebuilt for cross for less money than even the set of clinchers. Judging the current numbers I would say that I am unsure whether the gains are worth the nearly $400. If cost was even though, then the pain of dealing with tubs is, I think, worth the gains. After all, cross is about hurting right?